Impact of design on maintainability

Availability probability that a repairable system or system element is operational at a given point in time under a given set of environmental conditions.

This process differs significantly from the one usually taught in an introductory statistics course. Discipline Management In most large programs, RAM experts report to the system engineering organization. Large software intensive systems information systems are affected by issues related to configuration management, integration testing, and installation testing.

Reliability Life Tests are used to empirically assess the time to failure for non-repairable products and systems and the times between failure for repairable or restorable systems. Because of its potential impact on cost and schedule, reliability testing should be coordinated with the overall system engineering effort.

Redundancy must be accompanied by measures to ensure data consistency, and managed failure detection and switchover. As a result, that estimates based on Impact of design on maintainability data may be very imprecise.

First, the normal distribution is seldom used as a life distribution, since it is defined for all negative times. Systems that report only on repair actions and outage incidents may not be sufficient for this purpose. Test conditions must include accurate simulation of the operating environment including workload and a means of identifying and recording failures.

Administrative delay such as holidays can also affect repair times.

Impact of design on maintainability may work with those organizations to perform tradeoff analyses to determine the most cost efficient solution and to price service contracts. RAM testing is coordinated with other product or system testing through the testing organization, and test failures are evaluated by the RAM function through joint meetings such as a Failure Review Board.

Discrete distributions such as the Bernoulli, Binomial, and Poisson are used for calculating the expected number of failures or for single probabilities of success The same continuous distributions used for reliability can also be used for maintainability although the interpretation is different i.

A failure is the event sor inoperable state, in which any item or part of an item does not, or would not, perform as specified GEIA However, predictions of maintainability may have to account for processes such as administrative delays, travel time, sparing, and staffing and can therefore most complex.

Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability

Other are related to design for manufacturability, storage, and transportation Kapur, ; Eberlin Because of differences in domains and because many standards handle the same topic in slightly different ways, selection of the appropriate requires consideration of previous practices often documented as contractual requirementsdomain specific considerations, certification agency requirements, end user requirements if different from the acquisition or producing organizationand product or system characteristics.

In most computer based systems, hardware mean time between failures are hundreds of thousands of hours so that most system design measures will be to increase system reliability are focused on software. However, there are also tradeoffs with respect to access control, boundary devices, and authentication where security device failures could impact the availability of the product or system to users.

Some are general but more are specific to domains such as automotive, aviation, electric power distribution, nuclear energy, rail transportation, software, and many others. Such testing assess the system diagnostics capabilities, physical accessibility, and maintainer training by simulating hardware or software failures that require maintainer action for restoration.

The discussion in this section relies on a standard developed by a joint effort by the Electronic Industry Association and the U.

Discipline Standards Because of the importance of reliability, availability, and maintainability, as well as related attributes, there are hundreds of standards associated. However, performing such tests or collecting credible operating data once items are fielded can be costly. Where failure rates are not known as is often the case for unique or custom developed components, assemblies, or softwaredevelopmental testing may be undertaken assess the reliability of custom-developed components.

This can bias an analysis. These lead to RAM derived requirements and allocations that are approved and managed by the system engineering requirements management function. The most important of these are ensuring repeatability and uniformity of production processes and complete unambiguous specifications for items from the supply chain.

In some cases, the RAM function may recommend design or development process changes as a result of evaluation of test results or software discrepancy reports, and these proposals must be adjudicated by the system engineering organization, or in some cases, the acquiring customer if cost increases are involved.

The failure mode is the way or the consequence of the mechanism through which an item fails GEIALaprie RAM requirements definition is as challenging but as essential to development success as is the definition of general functional requirements.

Increased maintainability implies shorter repair times ASQ Termination criteria for such tests can be based on a planned duration or planned number of failures.

This dependency frequently makes analytical solution of problems involving maintainability intractable and promotes the use of simulation to support analysis.

Evaluations based on qualitative analyses assess vulnerability to single points of failure, failure containment, recovery, and maintainability.

The failure mechanism is the physical, chemical, electrical, thermal, or other process that results in failure GEIA Monitoring During Operation and Use After systems are fielded, their reliability and availability to assess whether system or product has met its RAM objectives, to identify unexpected failure modes, to record fixes, to assess the utilization of maintenance resources, and to assess the operating environment.

Specific dependencies and interactions include:Overview. Reliability, maintainability, and availability (RAM) are three system attributes that are of great interest to systems engineers, logisticians, and users. Evaluating Impact of Design Patterns on Software Maintainability and Performance Farooq Abdullah Thesis submitted for the degree of Master in.

It's also supported by conducting formal maintainability meetings, applying maintainability concepts in design and procurement, recognizing construction impact on maintainability, monitoring and evaluating program effectiveness, and conducting maintenance training and providing documentation.

Definition: Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability (RAM or RMA) are system design attributes that have significant impacts on the sustainment or total Life Cycle Costs (LCC) of a developed system. Additionally, the RAM attributes impact the ability to perform the intended mission and affect overall mission success.

The standard definition of. Impact of design on maintainability Those involved in the maintenance of the built environment will invariably, at some stage, wish to be able to turn back the clock to the time of the design development.

8 factors of design for maintainability. The first time I changed the oil filter of my car (first car in high school) I smashed my knuckles against a grimy block of metal.

Download
Impact of design on maintainability
Rated 0/5 based on 100 review